On May 7, 2024, former US President Donald Trump appeared in the Manhattan Criminal Court in new york on suspicion of covering up the payment of hush money related to extramarital affairs. win McNamee/Pool/AFP/Getty Images CNN& mdash； "The people call Stormy Daniels." At that moment, Donald Trump's hush money trial came back to life on Tuesday. In recent days, the trial has come to a deadlock because of boring testimony about accounting.
A former president-who may return to his desk in the Oval Office in January-met the adult movie star face to face for the first time in many years, and he was accused of using the hush money award to keep silent.
What happened next was tacky, eye-catching and painful for Trump. When Daniels painted a detailed scene of a black tile hotel suite, he was forced to sit with a frown. It is said that the former president still denied that there was a liaison.
On Tuesday, May 7th, Stormy Daniels was on trial at the hush money trial in donald trump. Christine Cornell's related articles are taken from Stormy Daniels's testimony in Trump's hush money trial. This is the latest incredible election activity, unprecedented. For an ordinary candidate who lacks the political disguise of Trump Teflon, this may be the end of the road.
But as often happens, after a devastating legal blow to the former president, there is a glimmer of hope. Late on Tuesday afternoon, he learned that his appointed Judge Irene Cannon had postponed the hearing of his confidential documents in Florida indefinitely. This means that Trump will almost certainly not face a federal jury accusing him of mishandling confidential information before the election–a reality that prompted his former White House legal adviser Ty Cobb to accuse Cannon of handling cases slowly, condoning frivolous motions and misunderstanding applicable laws. "This is an example of prejudice and incompetence," Cobb told CNN's Irene Burnett.
Cannon's move is accompanied by Trump's two election intervention cases, both of which are overwhelmed by his pre-trial delaying tactics and annoying appeals, and it is unlikely that a trial will be held before voters make a major choice in November.
Therefore, although the hush money case is widely regarded as the weakest case in a series of cases facing Trump, it may be the only case that may create an unprecedented scene, that is, a convicted felon asks voters to elect him president.
This makes Daniels' testimony even more important. Three and three-quarters hours after her first scarred appearance on the witness stand, the most important question is whether her obscene testimony is more likely to lead to a guilty verdict-or ultimately ruin the case.
In addition, will her description of her relationship with Trump fail to change any key swing state votes in November, like the outspoken disclosure of the former president's character?
Daniels revealed new details of his alleged contact with Trump nearly 20 years ago.
Daniels and former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen are one of the two main witnesses in the first criminal trial of the former US president. She told the jury on Tuesday that she had received 0,000 in hush money from Cohen before the 2016 election. This kind of payment is not illegal. But prosecutors accused Trump of falsifying business records to cover up the facts and misleading voters in the early election intervention. He pleaded not guilty.
"Stormy provided new information about her brief contact with Donald Trump, as well as additional information about many key factors in the case," legal analyst Noam Eisen told CNN's Wolf Blitzer. "This is the most important day in this eventful trial."
The play is even more wonderful than when it first appeared.
A transcript of the day's lawsuit showed that Judge Juan Melman and Trump's lawyer had an exchange that could not be heard in court. The judge complained that the former president "cursed loudly" and shook his head when Daniels testified. "This may intimidate the witness, and the jury can see it." The judge told Todd Blanche, a lawyer, that he talked with him in the judge's box to avoid embarrassing the defendant, but this behavior must stop. Jeremy Herb of CNN reported in court that Trump was more involved in the trial on Tuesday than ever before.
Trump's relationship with the judge is already on thin ice. The day before, Melman warned that if he continued to violate the gag order aimed at protecting jurors and witnesses, he might face jail. At the end of the day, when he spoke to reporters in the courtroom corridor, he did try to avoid crossing the line. But Daniels' blushing testimony may pose the most severe test of his shaky self-discipline so far, and make it possible for him to have a new showdown with mercom.
It is impossible to know how jurors will interpret individual chapters of the trial.
But Daniels provided details of her relationship with Trump, including his "silk or satin" pajamas, and she seemed to seriously weaken his denial that they were related. This may be crucial for explaining to jurors why Trump is so keen on covering up the facts.
But Trump's lawyer Susan Necheles was able to get Daniels to admit her dislike for Trump, and she wanted to see him responsible for it. This admission may cast doubt on her motives.
It only takes one juror to overturn the conviction. In the aggressive cross-examination that will continue on Thursday, naetscher tried to create reasonable doubt and disqualify Daniels as a credible witness. "You hate President Trump, am I right?" Naetscher asked. Daniels replied, "Yes." The former adult movie star was then asked if she wanted the former president to go to jail. "I hold him responsible for this," she replied.
Witnessed a surreal day
With Trump's attempt to win back the White House in November, dragged down by four criminal charges, an unfavorable civil fraud trial judgment worth 0 million, the humiliation of two impeachments, and the memory of his attack on democracy after the 2020 general election, the alleged facts of the case broadcast on Tuesday felt far less than the blow of history.
First of all, it all happened a long time ago. This incident can be traced back to 2006, when Trump and Daniels were in the hotel room of a celebrity golf tournament in Lake Tahoe, when the future president was in the early stage of his success as a reality TV star.
Daniels said that after coming back from the bathroom, she was shocked to see Trump wearing a T-shirt and boxer shorts on the bed. She testified that she took off her clothes and they made love in missionary positions. "I stared at the ceiling. I don't know how I got there, "Daniels said. "I'm wearing little ... golden high heels with little buckles. My hands are shaking badly. It's hard for me to get dressed. He said,' Oh, great. Honey, let's get together again. We are very happy together. I just want to leave. "
Nearly twenty years ago, neither Trump nor Daniels could have imagined that they would both embark on an incredible road-in the mid-1920s, a so-called bedroom secret that might have become a future president would spread throughout the court.
Although the so-called length of interaction between Trump and Daniels-and the subsequent attempt to cover up these interactions-may not necessarily have an important impact on the judgment of the case, they may be more important to the public's perception of the trial. This seems to have happened to Eric Trump, Trump's second son, who posted it on X in court on Tuesday to try a new attack route for Trump's campaign team. "Viewpoint: Sitting in the front row trying to figure out what the garbage from 20 years ago has to do with the' legal' bills submitted by a long-term private lawyer, which are recorded as' legal' fees," he wrote.
As usual, Donald Trump tried to add his own point of view to the incident.
"This is a very important day. After seeing his lawyer trying to refute Daniels' story bit by bit, Trump declared: "This is a very enlightening day. As you can see, their case has completely collapsed." . "They don't have any books or records." The former president may be too optimistic on this point, because the most important thing for Daniels is to establish a background story about why the so-called cover-up happened, and she has no first-hand knowledge about the so-called bookkeeping violations.
Nevertheless, after Daniels' sensational narrative, the former president's team proposed a mistrial on the grounds that unnecessary details about communication might bias the jury against their clients. Merchan denied this request, but admitted that some of the most explicit content was "better not to say"
This is a view that many Americans may agree with.